AW: [HSF] Percutaneous Valves

[Tea Acuff]

I am not sure, but this may be the first ever intuitive argument from Hal as opposed to his deductive "show me one study showing" arguments.
Maybe the constant barrage destroying his data during his STS dinner talk has loosened him up and opened his mind. On the other hand, a simpler explanation is, I could just be wrong once again.
Makes it harder to criticize me doesn't it, Hal?
tea


----- Original Message ----
From: "Hgrmd at aol.com" <Hgrmd at aol.com>
To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2007 6:25:10 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [HSF] Percutaneous Valves


Don and Ed,
  Tommy Walther's 10% mortality is probably a damn good result.   I've heard 
Fred speak about their experience at least a couple of times.   It's my 
understanding that these patients are terribly high risk patients with  Euroscore's 
of at least 25%.  This isn't like Ted Fedman's E-valve study  where they are 
enrolling good risk patients.
Hal
_______________________________________________
OpenHeart-L mailing list

Send postings to:
OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com

To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l

All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies and 
disclaimers posted at:
http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
-----------------------------------------