[HSF] Type I Dissection
Tea Acuff
tacuff at swbell.net
Tue Feb 6 20:07:31 EST 2007
The ASC aorta did not look that large, nor does the arch. I would electively replace the ascending aorta. If it had been and I thought that you said stable at 4.3 cm I would ask the patient his preference of waiting for a change (5-10%) or risk of surgery (5-10%?)
tea
----- Original Message ----
From: Edward Bender <ebender001 at charter.net>
To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2007 9:54:53 PM
Subject: Re: [HSF] Type I Dissection
Aortic. Just to be clear, the proximal ascending aorta and root are
now 7 cm.
On Feb 6, 2007, at 9:51 PM, Tohru Asai wrote:
>> Hancock II valve placed
> Aortic position or mitral? Tohru
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenHeart-L mailing list
>
> Send postings to:
> OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
>
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the
> policies and
> disclaimers posted at:
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> -----------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
OpenHeart-L mailing list
Send postings to:
OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies and
disclaimers posted at:
http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
-----------------------------------------
More information about the OpenHeart-L
mailing list