[HSF] On pump beating heart

hgrmd at aol.com hgrmd at aol.com
Wed Feb 28 14:57:04 EST 2007


Don,
  Your jazzman is living testament to the efficacy of extensive endarterectomies, whether done on or off.  The naysayers could possibly use some technical tips.
Hal
  
 
-----Original Message-----
From: donross at bigpond.com
To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
Sent: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 2:12 AM
Subject: Re: [HSF] On pump beating heart


> Though Don Ross does them by using his long shunts, he is in a > tiny minority. Perhaps the naysayers of endarterectomy who are > 100% OPCAB'ers would rethink their position if they tried it on > pump. Believe me, it works well. 
They sure do. 
 When I was a young fella I did three long endos on an "inoperable" Jazz guitarist. 25 years on he is still playing and angina free despite his vile vein grafts. 
Don 
> 
> Thanks Hal. 
> 
> Yes, I do endarterectomy, and I will not do this off 
> pump. We only get the occasional patient who needs it. 
> I have thought of taking out stents but have not been 
> brave enough! We sometimes get those calcific horrors 
> where there is no place to open the vessel. The last 
> one needed 2 `traditional` long incision 
> endarterectomies, with long patch anastomoses. 
> 
> Us `opcabbers` get enthusiastic when we can safely do 
> a full revascularisation the same way we would do it 
> on pump, we enjoy the operation more so approaching 
> 100% makes us feel better! We still know it is better 
> for the patient, even if marginally. But would not 
> hesitate to go on, and not hesitate to decide go on 
> pump pre-op if we think it safer. Just like you, I am 
> sure, would like to repair 100% of the valves you 
> tackle, but also would not spend too much time mucking 
> about when it becomes clear that the valve should 
> rather be cut out and replaced. 
> Dave 
> --- hgrmd at aol.com wrote: 
> 
>> Dave, 
>> Thanks for the clarification. Just make sure that 
>> you aren't finessing too vessels just so you can do 
>> the case off pump. Like Mark, I believe extensive 
>> endarterectomies should have a definite place in 
>> your quiver as we continue to get patients with more 
>> diffuse disease. Anyway, good luck with your policy 
>> and let us know how it goes. 
>> Hal 
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: drdharris at yahoo.co.uk 
>> To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com 
>> Sent: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 3:51 PM 
>> Subject: Re: [HSF] On pump beating heart 
>> 
>> 
>> HA HA, I knew I would get you guys going! What I 
>> meant 
>> was I RECENTLY started to do 100% off pump! That was 
>> the last 20 consecutive cases! Have not hit any 
>> rough 
>> ones since then! I`ll keep you posted! 
>> 
>> Seriously though, of course I agree there are 
>> `IMPOSSIBLE` cases! And these are probably done best 
>> beating on the pump. But I still am convinced the 
>> results will be better if you do 90% off pump, which 
>> I 
>> will generally aim for....however after recently see 
>> patients trash their legs and their bowel after 
>> being 
>> on the pump I vowed I`ll try to do 100% off! 
>> 
>> 
>> --- hgrmd at aol.com wrote: 
>> 
>>> Tea, 
>>> Coming from a guy who does a very high 
>> percentage 
>>> of cases off pump, your comment about 100% 
>> OPCAB'ers 
>>> is well taken. Having been an avid follower of 
>> HSF 
>>> for a few years, I've definitely seen my share of 
>>> breathless hyperbole (and no, I don't believe I've 
>>> been a part of it). 
>>> Hal 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message----- 
>>> From: tacuff at swbell.net 
>>> To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com 
>>> Sent: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:33 PM 
>>> Subject: Re: [HSF] On pump beating heart 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I would put froth coming out of the ET under the 
>>> category of "potential 
>>> problem". In reference to Chand's earlier patient 
>>> with portal venous air, froth 
>>> in the ET would also qualify as "unstable" even if 
>>> the BP was 100 on pressors. 
>>> One might not have to go on CPB, but it should be 
>> a 
>>> consideration and available. 
>>> It would be hard to object in retrospect to CPB 
>> even 
>>> if you go below 100% on 
>>> this one. 
>>> 
>>> I actually looked up my rate for 2004 and 2005 for 
>>> "CABG with no CPB" at my 
>>> primary hospital. The trend of cases is down and 
>> the 
>>> trend of "CAB and valve or 
>>> other" is up. In two years I did 3 cases of CAB 
>>> alone with CPB (including 
>>> redo's) in 150 cases. This is a 98% rate, I think. 
>>> Next year could be 90% or 
>>> 100%, but it won't be 10% or 50%. 
>>> 
>>> Here is what I hear when surgeons tell me their 
>> rate 
>>> of off pump surgery. 
>>> Although the most common thing they now say is 
>> that 
>>> they stopped or it is 
>>> rountine. It is just a guess, as always I could be 
>>> wrong, but when I check a 
>>> reference that visits the surgeon or see what they 
>>> do year after year I think I 
>>> may be more right than not: 
>>> I tried a few but wasn't comfortable.=we had some 
>>> bad results in the first ten 
>>> (I mean another surgeon obviously) so I stopped. 
>>> I do 10-20%=I tried it once or twice but didn't 
>> like 
>>> it. I might try it again if 
>>> I have too. 
>>> I do 30-40%. =I do half of my single and double 
>>> bypasses. 
>>> I do 50%.= I almost always do single and double 
>>> bypasses and some easy PL or 
>>> PDAs. 
>>> I do all of mine OPCAB.= I try do do most of mine 
>>> off pump (work in progress) or 
>>> perhaps it is actually my rountine. 
>>> I do 100% off pump.= Either I am FOS or I forgot 
>>> about the couple of problem 
>>> patients last year. If he writes a lot of papers 
>> it 
>>> is even money the former. 
>>> 
>>> I have no one in mind when I wrote this. Promise. 
>>> Almost. 
>>> tea 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ---- 
>>> From: David Harris <drdharris at yahoo.co.uk> 
>>> To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com 
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:08:30 PM 
>>> Subject: Re: [HSF] On pump beating heart 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I can`t remember when I last saw a patient in 
>>> cardiogenic shock referred for surgery....we have 
>>> excellent cardiologists who intervene 
>>> percutaneously, 
>>> and they do`nt turf the patient to us if half the 
>>> ventricle has been wiped out already. 
>>> 
>>> --- hgrmd at aol.com wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> When my group does OPCAB, they don't prime the 
>>> pump, 
>>>> either. However, they do have a perfusionist 
>> and 
>>> a 
>>>> pump in the room ready to go if the need arises. 
>> 
>>>> One hundred per cent OPCAB? You apparently 
>> don't 
>>>> offer surgery to patients in cardiogenic shock 
>> and 
>>>> froth coming out the ET tube. I have and do. 
>>>> However, no way would I consider doing that type 
>>> of 
>>>> patient off pump. 
>>>> 
>>>> Hal 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message----- 
>>>> From: drdharris at yahoo.co.uk 
>>>> To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com 
>>>> Sent: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 4:48 PM 
>>>> Subject: Re: [HSF] On pump beating heart 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I agree fully with Tea: there is no need to have 
>>> the 
>>>> pump primed for an OPCAB, unless it is a 
>> potential 
>>>> problem. Similarly, with increased experience, 
>> the 
>>>> cardiologists never ask for standby for PTCA. 
>>> Those 
>>>> nasty earlier conversions were during the 
>> learning 
>>>> curve, when we did not know the limits. We know 
>>>> where 
>>>> the limits are now, and it will be safe: limited 
>>>> traction for first graft (LAD), with a few 
>> sutures 
>>>> just above phrenic nerve, use of shunts always, 
>>> not 
>>>> accepting any extrasystole, (and sorting out 
>> what 
>>> is 
>>>> causing them immediately), careful manipulation 
>>> for 
>>>> last grafts by verticalisation only, and not 
>>>> accepting 
>>>> ANY hypotension before carrying on. 
>>>> I have recently changed to 100% OPCAB, and you 
>> can 
>>>> immediately see the difference, and the major 
>>>> difference is seen not only in hospital, but 
>>> during 
>>>> the first 3 months. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --- hgrmd at aol.com wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>>> Tea, 
>>>>> Knowing you as I do, I've no doubt that you 
>>>> speak 
>>>>> the truth about your OPCAB experience (For 
>> once, 
>>>> I'm 
>> 
> === message truncated === 
> 
> 
> Dr. David G. Harris, FCS, MMED, 
> Cardiothoracic Surgeon 
> Suite A2 
> Tygerberg Hospital, 7505 
> Cape Town, South Africa. 
> Tel +27-21-9762347 
> Fax +27-21-9761157 Mobile +27-83-3309587 
> _______________________________________________ 
> OpenHeart-L mailing list 
> 
> Send postings to: 
> OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com 
> 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives: 
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l 
> 
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the > policies and 
> disclaimers posted at: 
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim 
> ----------------------------------------- 
> ______________________________________________________________________> __ 
> Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and > security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from > across the web, free AOL Mail and more. 
> _______________________________________________ 
> OpenHeart-L mailing list 
> 
> Send postings to: 
> OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com 
> 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives: 
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l 
> 
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the > policies and 
> disclaimers posted at: 
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim 
> ----------------------------------------- 
_______________________________________________ 
OpenHeart-L mailing list 
 
Send postings to: 
OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com 
 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives: 
http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l 
 
All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies anddisclaimers posted at: 
http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim 
----------------------------------------- 
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.


More information about the OpenHeart-L mailing list