[HSF] Traumatic tricuspid regurg
Rwmfglycar at aol.com
Rwmfglycar at aol.com
Thu Jan 4 16:21:09 EST 2007
In a message dated 1/4/2007 4:12:16 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
nkkejriwal at gmail.com writes:
Dear members
An interesting case has been referred to me. The patient is a 65 year old
lady who underwent dual chamber pacing a few years ago. Recently she
presented to the cardiologist with pacemaker pocket site infection. The
cultures did not grow any bug, but the generateor was eroding through the
skin. Last week the cardiologist pulled out all the hardwares. Apparently he
tore one of the pap m of the TV while removing the RV lead. Now the patient
has severe TR. I am enclosing the echo frames showing the bit of pap m with
attached chordae flopping in & out of RV resulting in severe TR. The patient
had mild to mod TR before the lead removal. There is no evidence of TV
endocarditis on echo. The annulus measures 40mm. Normal coronaries.
What is the best option?
Repair by suturing the muscle back and putting an annuloplasty ring? Will it
work? My concern is that if the lead were infected, would it be wise to
leave the leaflets behind?
Or, remove all the leaflets with chordae and insert a bioprosthesis?
Dear Nand: she had some TricReg before the trauma. This may have been due to
the lead but may imply that she already has an abnormal RV. Certainly the
annulus is dilated. She has severe TR now and there is absolutely no doubt in
my mind that despite the publications from Detroit in the past significant TR
is not a normal state. We were very much involved, 20 years ago, in the
debates on valve excision versus valve replacement for tricuspid endocarditis. We
came down firmly on the side of valve replacement or repair. We found poor
outcomes with neglected or deliberately produced severe Tric Reg. Futhermore as
with all endocarditis we found that appropriate antibiotics for only a few
days protected against recurrent infection whether we were doing replacement
or repair. ( We came to this opinion from left sided cases with severe failure
as an imperative indication for surgery without delay).
I suspect this may have been erosion rather than infection. In the absence
of vegetations virtually all cases of endocarditis due to a sensitive organism
respond to antibiotics. Where do you think the infection is? The lead is
already out. The reason why the pap muscle tore is because the lead was
connected to it by fibrous healing. I believe you do not need to wait for some
arbitrary 4wks of time on antibiotics, which in the absence of a positive culture
may be useless anyhow. What you do when you get inside depends on the
pathology. If the ruptured pap muscle is giving rise to chordal support of only a
small part of a leaflet (I could not evaluate this because I could not open
your attachment) you can do an excision and annuloplasty and feel better about
any unlikely possibilty of leaving residual infection behind. Neochordae are
an option as is leaflet and chordal replacement with pericardium (properly
treated xenograft or briefly tanned autogenous)
I am also planning to attach RV & LV epicardial leads. I shall sew the LV
lead close to the 1st OM artery posteriorly. What is the best spot for the
RV lead?
I always thought the apex site gave better RV performance but others have
advocated an RV ouflow site. (It made no sense for me for the ouflow part of
the ventricle to contract first).
Yours
Bob
Thanks
Nand
_______________________________________________
OpenHeart-L mailing list
Send postings to:
OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies and
disclaimers posted at:
http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
-----------------------------------------
More information about the OpenHeart-L
mailing list