[HSF] Unusual response to warfarin
Tea Acuff
tacuff at swbell.net
Wed Jul 11 10:54:24 EDT 2007
Bob,
Thanks for you insights. Fortunately I did not have to give my daughter Vit K so I really did not get a feel of back a forth with Vit k and coumadin like I might using TNG and epi.
tea
----- Original Message ----
From: "Rwmfglycar at aol.com" <Rwmfglycar at aol.com>
To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 8:09:24 AM
Subject: Re: [HSF] Unusual response to warfarin
In a message dated 7/10/2007 10:26:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
prasannasimha at gmail.com writes:
> I think that there are probably patients who are quite "brittle" to borrow
a word (sorry, Ben).
> The other thing to consider is the usefulness of home testing and
patience. Even a mg or two a day when the patient is taking 10mg can make a
difference. There is a lag of around 48 hours or so before what ever you did is
noticed. (I learned this treating my daughter at home despite two decades of
"managing coumadin" in my practice...all three points) What you describe is the
same thing with the hypersenitive and heavy handed yet diligent nurse (or
anesthesiologist, anyone but us) pushing the BP from 60 to 200 and back to 60
with drips in the ICU. Bet you have seen that, too.
> The last thing to remember (for which i would like confirmation from our
experts) is that our targets (much like our "best practices") are misleading
as are my analogical thoughts. As in the ACT on CPB higher is not necessarily
"more" anticoagulated or more to the point, less thrombotic, right Ben?, but
decreases the frequency of drop to below anticoagulated. I was told by
another expert that an INR over 2 is all that is needed, but a level of 2-2.5 means
that the patient spends frequent time below 2. (See above.)
> tea
>
Tea,
It is all about Titration and the variability of individual response whether
you are dealing with inotropic or vasoactive drugs, coumadin or heparin or
adjusting preload with volume. As you say patience is crucial and also direct
involvement. Titration by proxy is never quite the same and that brings us to
the unstretchable nature of time and the very difficult issue of the use of
our time.
Coumadin is one of the worst drugs we use or should I say most difficult.
With some patients it is a breeze but in others always tricky. Your comments are
all apt. Yes the patient is likely to spend time below 2 or above 2.5 if
the hoped for range is 2-2.5. Only the people on home testing can tell you
this. What can we possibly know with weekly or monthly testing? The good news is
that most patients who are trying to follow directions avoid valve
thrombosis and hemorrhage most of the time. The consequences of not following
instructions can vary to an extraordinary degree; I saw a patient who thrombosed her
valve completely in two weeks while under anticoagulated and another who
stopped attending the coumadin clinic, could not be found and puttered along for
a year before finally coming to the ER with pulmonary edema and a mixture of
pannus and thrombus. (Note that I did not mention emboli: the primary
purpose of coumadin is prevention of valve thrombosis; platelet active agents are
needed to prevent emboli, although trials are underway to test effectiveness
at preventing thrombosis).
Tea you observed a 48 hour lag in response to changes in dosage. In a
patient who had been bleeding and in whom a reduction in anticoagulation effect was
desired what would be the lag after an oral dose of Vitamin K? (I get asked
these kinds of questions).
For Prasanna: Dieter Horstkotte ran the Gelia trial and determined where the
lines depicting hemorrahge and thrombosis crossed.
Bob
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
_______________________________________________
OpenHeart-L mailing list
Send postings to:
OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies and
disclaimers posted at:
http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
-----------------------------------------
More information about the OpenHeart-L
mailing list