[HSF] Post-op arrest
A
alsadd at ksu.edu.sa
Tue Jul 17 15:39:38 EDT 2007
Hal:
>From the history that Don gave us there was no preop VT. I do not know why
the patient should need EPS at this stage. It is clearly ischemic in nature
and one need to address that. This is in my humble opinion
Ahmed
-----Original Message-----
From: openheart-l-bounces at lists.hsforum.com
[mailto:openheart-l-bounces at lists.hsforum.com] On Behalf Of Hgrmd at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:19 AM
To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
Subject: Re: [HSF] Post-op arrest
Don,
At the very least, the man needs an EPS or, better yet, go straight to
implantation of ICD. I can understand the reluctance of the cardiologist
to
intervene after a fresh CABG, but he certainly should if there are ongoing
signs
of ischemia. I would compromise and recommend a nuclear stress. If
positive, then intervention. It might be safer if you can wait about 6
weeks before
doing a PCI. I remember seeing a cardiologist produce tamponade after
rupturing a distal with a balloon a couple of days post-CABG. Waiting a
few weeks
would allow scar to grow around the heart, and perhaps minimize the
likelihood of tamponade.
Hal
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL
at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
_______________________________________________
OpenHeart-L mailing list
Send postings to:
OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies and
disclaimers posted at:
http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
-----------------------------------------
More information about the OpenHeart-L
mailing list