[HSF] Redo Radical Mitral Valvuloplasty
Hgrmd at aol.com
Hgrmd at aol.com
Sat Jun 2 10:15:33 EDT 2007
Bob,
Many thanks for weighing in on my case. To me, your insight is the best
part of HSF. As for the case in question, pannus covered only the ring and
not the leaflets. I think the restriction was from subsequent adverse
remodeling and consequent tethering. From reading the original op note, the LV was
moderately impaired at the time of the initial surgery (EF 45%). As you well
know, EF's less than 60% are now considered impaired with severe MR. My
original op note didn't describe any difficulty with weaning, though the post-CPB
EF was 40% on moderate inotropes. Obviously, the original operation
required a nearly 2 hour clamp time, which could explain the eventual continued
adverse remodeling (yes, Tomas, maybe it would have been better to do this your
way, though I think a repair of this magnitude would have been hell under
those conditions.).
I note your concern about using autologous pericardium for the patch. My
hope is that the gluteraldehyde tanning will prevent it. As for downsizing
the ring from 32 to 28mm, I firmly think that was the right decision since TEE
revealed that the mitro-aortic angle was wide, and there was plenty of room
in the LVOT. Thus, the likelihood of SAM was practically nonexistent. I
figured in this myopathic ventricle that downsizing would aid in obtaining a
good depth of coaptation (It looked to be 15 mm when I finished).
Hal
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
More information about the OpenHeart-L
mailing list