[HSF] Another question...

[Donald Ross]

Tea,
I agree with your thoughts on EBM aristocracy and just wondered  
after  your asides on some of my ultra-subjective observations that  
you may have recently been elevated to the peerage.
Every court needs a jester, a seer and a philosopher.
Cheers,
Don
On 08/06/2007, at 1:32 PM, Tea Acuff wrote:

> Don Ross wrote:
>
> ( Sorry it is only a subjective observation Tea but I believe there
> is no EBM on the subject. If there was, Prasanna would have found  
> it. )
>
> Don,
> Although witty (which may be thepoint anyway) you seem somewhat   
> confused about my thoughts on observations.
> First: All observations are subjective (limited).
> Second: All EBM is even more limited than the many observations  
> available, and thus even more subjective in scope (even if more  
> powerful in a narrow focus).
> Third: What to do with with either the observation or its more  
> aristocratic evidence is also subjective.
> We are now at the level of observing the observation which  
> completes the circle to #1 where we start over.
> Lastly: you are likely correct about Prasanna.
> Just an observation...
> tea
> _______________________________________________
> OpenHeart-L mailing list
>
> Send postings to:
>  OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
>
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the  
> policies and
> disclaimers posted at:
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> -----------------------------------------