[HSF] ICU Management Systems
Jbflegejr at aol.com
Jbflegejr at aol.com
Thu Apr 10 15:00:19 EDT 2008
Michael,
I had the opportunity to work as a visiting surgeon in Umea, Sweden for three
months in 2001-2002 and participated in a system of care from which we could
derive some ideas. Umea has a tertiary care university medical center. The
heart center had cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, cardiac anesthesiologists, and
support staffs in a single administrative unit which was headed by Torkel
Aberg, the chief of cardiac surgery. About 1000 cardiac operations, all adult,
were done annually and the case mix was similar to ours as to age, diabetes, COPD
and other comorbities. Hospital mortality ranged from 1% to 2% since
inception of the unit in 1988. They have a CT surgical training program. There were
seven or eight attending surgeons which included a visiting surgeon or two.
Physicians in Sweden, trainees and attendings, have observed a mandated 40 hour
work week for thirty years.
The surgeons and anesthesiologists provided the postoperative care until
discharge. The surgeons rotated beween operative duties and postoperative care
every two weeks or so. When a surgeon was on operative duty, that is all that he
did, ordinarily a case or two each day. When he was on postoperative care with
the anesthesiologists he also was responsible for consultations and made the
decisions for operation or not. The operating surgeon reviewed the patient
assigned to him for operation the evening before and made the final decision
before proceeding. The operating surgeon was finished at the end of the day and if
his operation was not finished, the on-call surgeon took over. Imagine my
surprise as I was well along with operation for aortic dissection when the on
call surgeon tapped me on the shoulder and informed me that it was 5 o’clock and
I was finished for the day.
The on-call team composed of surgeons and anesthesiologists took care of the
patients at night and weekends including take-backs for bleeding, emergencies,
etc.
I characterised this as a corporate system and it provided as good care as I
have seen. It depended on a staff that had equivalent capability and trusted
one another and on highly standardized policies and procedures. It functioned
well despite the rather stringent work hour constraints.
I am sure that those of you who read this will put forward plenty of reasons
why such a system could never work in the USA such as the doctors won’t accept
it, the patients won’t accept it, the system for payment won’t work, the
surgeon cannot have all of his individual preferences, etc.
In my view, the way we work now does not work very well and as those of us
who grew up awhile ago when ideals and expectations were considerably different
drift from the scene the way we work now will be untenable. I firmly believe
that within a short time work hour constraints will apply to all physicians and
will be considerably more stringent than now. How are the patients, which
will likely include me, going to receive good care unless we drastically change
the way we work? John Flege
**************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)
More information about the OpenHeart-L
mailing list