[HSF] Standard of care for lawyers {OT}

Tea Acuff tacuff at swbell.net
Sat Apr 12 20:15:54 EDT 2008


Michael, 
I think you are starting to add to the mental characteristics of your CV system.


tea



----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Firstenberg <msfirst at gmail.com>
To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 7:42:03 PM
Subject: Re: [HSF] Standard of care for lawyers {OT}

Ani,

What is going to happen to your system which is built around  
housestaff/fellows who may either be of marginal quality or may not  
even be available at all.

It sounds like a very reliable system is the smallest team possible -  
a surgeon/PA/NP (anesthesiologist/pulm) group that works together day  
in and day out for years rather than a different combination each day  
- and every deals with their own problems?


-michael


On Apr 12, 2008, at 8:25 PM, Tea Acuff wrote:

> John wrote:
> "By moving to  the university about 7 years ago, I traded a lot of  
> advantages for
> the rather  dubious distinction of being a professor. John Felge"
>
> Well at least you are a "bonafied" expert now, John. I think you  
> made my point that for the attending to consult directly with the  
> nurse and visa versa is a very efficient system, and with time a  
> fairly trustworthy and transparent one. It is seemingly now a novel  
> one and substandard one at that. To Michael's cry for help in a  
> "broken" system (like Prasanna we all have choices to make,  
> Michael) i can not tell that the layers and layers of protocol, and  
> layers of caregivers, P4P, JACHO interventions or adoption of the  
> latest best new intensive treatments have added much to better  
> care. That they are primarily the work of third parties defending  
> turf or "consultants" trying to justify their repetitive surprise  
> inspections. This is a characteristic of medicine and doctors to  
> NOT think through the problems that they create and instead come up  
> with a universal "fix" (usually new inflexible rule or new  
> expensive care intermediate) to solve the problem for them.
>
> As for PA's, Ani, I have worked with the same one for well over a  
> decade. She is another pair of eyes and a very consistent OR  
> assistant. She halves my out of OR work day and likely shortens my  
> OR day. However, she is not my night  and weekend on call  
> surrogate, nor is she a source of net income to my practice. I did  
> not critisize your system except to say that I have fair skepticism  
> for your blanket dismissal of one that may be the most common in  
> the US certainly out of academia. How can the most common solution  
> be substandard? I can understand if you merely think it inferior.  
> Don't kid yourself or me, Ani. Everyone here and certainly any  
> lawyer will qualify you as expert. Point out possible disadvantages  
> all you like (I like hearing them), but be both clear and careful  
> if you wish to establish standards for others.
>
> tea
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "Jbflegejr at aol.com" <Jbflegejr at aol.com>
> To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
> Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:00:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [HSF] Standard of care for lawyers {OT}
>
> Hal, I am now in an academic setting. I relied virtually  
> exclusively on
> nurses in a previous life and that for 25 years. They did not open  
> the chest for
> tamponading patients and that didn't happen often anyway. I lived  
> four miles
> from the hospital and if I was at home, I could get here in less  
> than 10
> minutes  during the night when no ordinary folks were on the  
> streets. I doubt if
> intensivists would be much use there. The nurses did put in  
> central  lines and
> arterial lines with none of the complications that I see daily in  
> my  present
> setting and could have put in Swans but for some bureaucratic  
> obstacles.  The
> cardiologists charge for S-G, called right heart cath, and could  
> not allow  it
> to become a non-billable nursing procedure. I almost never saw  
> pneumothorax
> during the first two postop days after I started routinely opening the
> mediastinal pleura a little bit so the mediastinal tubes would  
> handle any lung
> leaks that might happen. We had a policy of not leaving any central  
> lines in
> place for more than 48 hours and the nurses changed them. We did  
> not have
> anesthesiologists or CRNA in the hospital at night those early  
> years. Routinely  I
> kept the patients asleep and on ventilator until the next morning  
> after
> operation which eliminated the need for early reintubation which I  
> would have  had to
> do. With the patient ventilated and pacing wires in place the  
> nurses  could
> manage with telephone guidance anything but bleeding. Sometimes  
> when there  was
> a need for take back for bleeding I did it without an anesthetist  
> and just
> gave a big dose of morphine and some curare. Often the anesthetist  
> did not get
> there from home until the case was finished. We did not have in house
> anesthesia  coverage until it was mandated to maintain the  
> obstetrical service. By
> moving to  the university about 7 years ago, I traded a lot of  
> advantages for
> the rather  dubious distinction of being a professor. John Felge
>
>
>
> **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money &
> Finance.      (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolcmp00300000002850)
> _______________________________________________
> OpenHeart-L mailing list
>
> Send postings to:
> OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
>
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the  
> policies and
> disclaimers posted at:
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> -----------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> OpenHeart-L mailing list
>
> Send postings to:
>  OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
>
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the  
> policies and
> disclaimers posted at:
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> -----------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OpenHeart-L mailing list

Send postings to:
OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com

To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l

All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies and 
disclaimers posted at:
http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
-----------------------------------------


More information about the OpenHeart-L mailing list