[HSF] Intimal Tears
Edward Bender
ebender001 at charter.net
Mon Feb 4 20:31:41 EST 2008
I see nothing conflicting in operating on your renal transplant
patient. I remember a patient I had in 1982 who had undergone a renal
transplant, that came in with a fever and no other symptoms until he
arrested and died 6 hours later. I attended the autopsy and was
aghast to see a transmural anterior MI probably 4 days old. Important
coronary disease can be asymptomatic and eventually fatal, and the
fatality can be aborted by CABG.
Ed Bender, MD
On Feb 4, 2008, at 7:17 PM, Ani Anyanwu wrote:
> Ed
>
> Not really. Surgery is my job and I would just do my job whatever it
> is. Whether what I do or what we do is the 'right' thing is another
> question which is what I raised in the earlier discussion. LVAD
> therapy is no different from any other and we still weigh the risks
> and benefits of each case and sometimes say no, as I did to a 71
> year old in post infarct cardiogenic shock last week with a logistic
> euroSCORE of 98. Also all patients having VADs and high risk valve
> operations are sick, very sick and symptomatic. We (doctors) do not
> go looking for them - they look for us. Screen triggered disease and
> VOMIT is different because you are operating on people who never
> complained about whatever it is you say they need fixing. I am
> operating on one such patient this week, incidental coronary disease
> in a patient needing kidney transplant and I still feel uneasy about
> whether I am doing the right thing. Dr Frater put it very well - we
> should be prepared to hold conflicting views on what we do in our
> heads at the same time. My views have little to do with my practice
> as a surgeon or as a doctor. I just don't like brain washing whether
> I am at the giving end or receiving end.
>
> Ani
>
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:13:23 -0600> Subject: Re: [HSF] Intimal
>> Tears> From: ebender001 at charter.net> To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>> > CC: > > I don't mean to "pile on" Ani with this question, but
>> ever since our> discussions about carotid artery surgery Ani's
>> responses about avoidance of> medical personnel and "VOMIT" have
>> been bothering me. Ani, I gather from> your missives that you have
>> the difficult job of performing a lot of> desperate operations on
>> desperate patients. Naturally, a lot of the> outcomes are
>> predictably fatal, with the successes being all that much> sweeter.
>> Do you think that your aversion to aggressive diagnosis and>
>> intervention has anything to do with the arena in which you
>> perform? I bet> that if I had to go through what you go through, I
>> would be averse to> "looking for trouble" also. I remember Tom
>> Starzl commenting that he found> the renal transplant work
>> enjoyable, and the research was challenging, but> when he started
>> in on liver transplants, that was when the torture really> began
>> for him.> > Ed Bender, MD> > > On 2/4/08 5:28 PM, "Tea Acuff" <tacuff at swbell.net
>> > wrote:> > > Of course the problem with logic and prospective
>> complications is that one can> > argue either way retrospectively.
>> Some are stronger arguments (as in Ani's> > calculations), but none
>> are clear.> > > > tea> > > > > > ----- Original Message ----> >
>> From: Prasanna Simha M <prasannasimha at gmail.com>> > To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>> > > Sent: Monday, February 4, 2008 10:45:19 AM> > Subject: Re:
>> [HSF] Intimal Tears> > > > Playing Ani's ethics game - is it
>> ethical to postpone surgery to> > demonstrate liabilities (which
>> may not ever occur or if occurs may not> > change outcomes and is
>> in no way concerned with patient outcome ) versus> > going ahead
>> with surgery (whose outcomes also may not change.> > Prasanna> > >
>> > On Feb 4, 2008 5:19 PM, Ani Anyanwu <anianyanwu at hotmail.com>
>> wrote:> > > >>> and close the rent with a purse string. The last
>> option is remove the>> >> dilator , compress and cancel the case
>> for 24 hours.> >> > >> Prasanna> >> > >> This last option has two
>> advantages - 1) It will differentiate a carotid> >> puncture
>> related stroke from a surgeon related stroke - you never know what>
>> >> the anesthesiologist has done and if any drugs have been given.
>> We recently> >> had a patient stroke after direct administration of
>> norepinephrine and> >> propofol into the carotid artery (this was
>> in an ICU patient with the line> >> placed by a surgeon). 2) Avoids
>> a neck incision.> >> > >> We had a similar case to yours in a child
>> when I was at Harefield, where> >> we could not get the ACT to rise
>> despite boluses and boluses of heparin. In> >> the end doing it the
>> old fashioned way worked (directly injecting into the> >> RA). At
>> some point in the surgery the right pleura was opened to reveal> >>
>> white fluid (propofol) - all the medication had been going straight
>> into the> >> pleural cavity where the tip of the line resided.> >>
>> > >> Ani> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> _______________________________________________> OpenHeart-L
>> mailing list> > Send postings to:> OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com> >
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
>> > > All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the
>> policies and > disclaimers posted at:> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
>> > -----------------------------------------
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get Hotmail on your mobile, text MSN to 63463!
> http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx_______________________________________________
> OpenHeart-L mailing list
>
> Send postings to:
> OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
>
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the
> policies and
> disclaimers posted at:
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> -----------------------------------------
More information about the OpenHeart-L
mailing list