[HSF] tricuspid noncoaptation

Nasser F. Abou'Seada nfaabouseada at gmail.com
Fri Feb 15 09:37:21 EST 2008


A redo sternotomy should impose no bleeding nor collateral damage ...... IN
THE HANDS OF THEE WHO CAN PERFORM IT ...

NFA

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 7:51 AM, <zzhoumd at pol.net> wrote:

>
> I think minimize the collateral damage and less of bleeding helps. No
> sternotomy also makes bleeding less and recovery easier.
>
> Z Zhou
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
>  From: Ben Bidstrup <benjamin.bidstrup at bigpond.com>
>
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:14:17
> To:OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
> Subject: Re: [HSF] tricuspid noncoaptation
>
>
> So, why is that different to a sternotomy apart from the length. With
> an OnQ they can be up in  a few hours.
>
> >Dear NFA,
> >
> >Correct me if wrong, The thoracotomy you are talking about is the
> >traditional one that 10-15 inch long and cutting through all the
> >muscles. If you do a muscle sparing incision, the pain is
> >surprisingly less.
> >
> >the mini valve incision is only 2-3 inch size. The muscle is split
> >in the direction of the fibers. I admit sometimes they have
> >significant amount pain. But there are a few things can be done.
> >Such as use ON-Q, cut a small piece of the broken rib. Most
> >importantly, once pain goes away, usually after couple of weeks,
> >patients just look like a normal person. They have no restrictions.
> >Usually bleeding is not a problem. I have not had a post op bleeding
> >patient that require reexplore. I have done many robotic midcab
> >patients on plavix without stopping it.
> >
> >Hope that answers the questions.
> >
> >Z Zhou
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: "Nasser F. Abou'Seada" <nfaabouseada at gmail.com>
> >
> >Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:03:01
> >To:OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
> >Subject: Re: [HSF] tricuspid noncoaptation
> >
> >
> >"a little better if you have done some."
> >
> >Dear Z
> >Certainly one thing I have learnt during my thoracic training in
> Liverpool
> >& Blackpool, that thoracotomy is far away from being non-painful .. even
> >with a muscle sparing incision- ... yet to my mind, the issue is not just
> >the pain ... nor the SCAR ..... -whereas we already do have an old
> incision-
> >but in the MUSCLE CUTTING involved in thoracotomy ...... please correct
> me
> >if I am wrong ..... such a right thoracotomy would certainly entail
> muscle
> >cutting ... the RA will be in the DEPTH of the wound .... plus the known
> >difficulties in securing the aorta and the cavae .....
> >I am not saying it is a wrong incision ........ might even be better in
> case
> >of a primary incision ... in the hands of those acquainred with it
> >..........
> >yet
> >the issue is WHY should there be another incision where we do already
> have
> >one ???? any special reason ? ,,....
> >certainly a rib fracturing incision is NOT less painful than a sternotomy
> >...
> >  and for those who have seen patients coming to postoperative clinics
> after
> >thoracotomy incisions ..... -especially in a total thoracic practice I
> mean-
> >. they would understand the feelings and the defects of patients having a
> >CUT muscle, a weak limb .... a new scar ..... for no cosmetic reason !!!!
> >apart from that ....... the issue elegantly raised by ANI ........ what
> IF
> >the patient should require another intervention for another procedure on
> the
> >mitral later on ???? ........... would not the designated surgeon  -then-
> >have wished the right thoracotomy approach is virgin ???  ........
> >sure we are ALL aware of the lung adhesion problems after thoracotomy
> >........ !! ...
> >
> >all the time I do feel grateful to my magnificent teachers .... J.D.
> >Drakeley, R.D.Donnelly, J.L.Mercer ..... R.K Khan, and R.G. Gandhi ....
> real
> >masters of thoracic surgery .... high volume load .... wide real practice
> >... and extra-ordinary professionals ...
> >
> >NFA
> >On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Zhandong Zhou <zzhoumd at pol.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>  The recovery from thoracotomy is a little better if you have done
> some.
> >>
> >>
> >>  ----- Original Message -----
> >>  From: "Nasser F. Abou'Seada" <nfaabouseada at gmail.com>
> >>  To: <OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com>
> >>   Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 8:58 AM
> >>  Subject: Re: [HSF] tricuspid noncoaptation
> >>
> >>
> >>  > Very well Said Sir
> >>  >
> >>  > NFA
> >>  >
> >>  > On Feb 13, 2008 4:06 PM, Ani Anyanwu <anianyanwu at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  >> Hal and Dave
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Why would we do a right thoracotomy here (other than because we can
> or
> >>  to
> >>  >> make life easier for ourselves)? Why should we give this lady
> another
> >>  scar
> >>  >> and how would it benefit her?
> >>  >>
> >>  >> A resternotomy here to repair the tricuspid is a low risk procedure
> and
> >>  is
> >>  >> not complicated (by low risk I refer to the resternotomy and NOT
> the
> >  > >> tricuspid repair) . Using Hals technique of peripheral bypass, all
> one
> >>  needs
> >>  >> to do is go on bypass, the large empty RV/RA will fall back, spilt
> the
> >>  >> sternum (or just the lower half), free the heart and then the large
> >>  right
> >>  >> atrium is most likely staring you in the face. Open it and fix the
> >>  valve,
> >>  >> close atrium then close sternum. The risks of resternotomy are
> minimal
> >>  >> particularly if you use peripheral bypass and there is no need to
> >>  dissect
> >>  >> the heart and great vessels.
> >>  >>
> >>  >> I can understand a right thoracotomy if this was a primary
> operation,
> >>  or
> >>  >> if additional indication such as patent IMAs, multiple
> reoperations,
> >>  aorta
> >>  >> in proximity to sternum etc., but not sure there is justification
> to
> >>  give
> >>  >> this lady a second scar in this case. Also a thoracotomy is not an
> >>  innocuous
> >>  >> incision. Maybe too when in few years she comes for her mitral
> >>  reoperation,
> >>  >> you might wish you had left her right thorax virgin!
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Ani
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >> > To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com> Subject: Re: [HSF] tricuspid
> >>  >> noncoaptation> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:06:45 -0500> From:
> >>  hgrmd at aol.com>
> >>  >> CC: > > Dave,> ? I wouldn't risk a DeVega on any tricuspid repair,
> >>  because
> >>  >> I've seen trivial TR become torrential in a very short time frame.?
> If
> >>  the
> >>  >> annulus is dilated, it deserves a ring.> ? Your suggestion to
> approach
> >>  the
> >>  >> tricuspid, beating heart, via the right chest is exactly what I
> would
> >>  do.> >
> >>  >> Hal> > > -----Original Message-----> From: David Harris <
> >>  >> drdharris at yahoo.co.uk>> To: OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com> Sent:
> Wed,
> >>  13
> >>  >> Feb 2008 2:58 pm> Subject: Re: [HSF] tricuspid noncoaptation> > > >
> I
> >>  agree
> >>  >> with you Hal. In this case definitely a ring.> Do you think a De
> Vega
> >>  will
> >>  >> suffice in cases of> trivial TR (at the time of mitral repair)?> >
> >>  Also,
> >>  >> what about a mini-thoracotomy approach in this> patient. This will
> be
> >>  the
> >>  >> simplest approach,> especially as one does not need to access or
> clamp
> >>  the>
> >>  >> aorta.> > Dave> > --- Hgrmd at aol.com wrote:> > > Erdinc,> > Your
> >>  patient's
> >>  >> plight supports my current policy> > of doing tricuspid > >
> >>  valvuloplasty on
> >>  >> around 70% of my mitral procedures.> > I totally agree with Bob
> that >
> >>  > any
> >>  >> documentation of moderate or worse TR on a preop> > echo is a solid
> > >
> >>  >> indication for annuloplasty. In addition, if the> > systolic
> annular
> >>  >> diameter exceeds > > 40 mm on the pre-CPB TEE, regardless of the
> >>  degree> >
> >>  >> of TR, the patient gets a > > ring. I always use the C-E MC3 ring.
> It
> >>  >> conforms> > to the natural 3D geometry > > of the tricuspid
> annulus.
> >>  Better,
> >>  >> more flexible,> > rings will be coming out > > soon.> > > > Hal> >
> > >
> >>  > > >
> >>  >> > **************The year's hottest artists on the red> > carpet at
> the
> >>  >> Grammy > > Awards. Go to AOL Music. > >> (
> >>  >> http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565)> >
> >>  >> _______________________________________________> > OpenHeart-L
> mailing
> >>  list>
> >>  >> > > > Send postings to:> > OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com> > > > To
> >>  >> UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view> > archives:> >
> >>  >> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l> > > > All messages
> >>  >> transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are> > subject to the policies and >
> >
> >>  >> disclaimers posted at:> > http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim> >
> >>  >> -----------------------------------------> > > > > Dr. David G.
> Harris,
> >>  FCS,
> >>  >> MMED,> Cardiothoracic Surgeon > Suite 207 > Kuils River Private
> >>  Hospital, >
> >>  >> PO Box 1200, Kuils River, 7579, Cape Town, South Africa. > Tel
> >>  >> +27-21-9006411 > Fax +27-21-9006412 Mobile +27-83-3309587>
> >>  >> _______________________________________________> OpenHeart-L
> mailing
> >>  list> >
> >>  >> Send postings to:> OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com> > To UNSUBSCRIBE,
> to
> >>  >> CHANGE email address, or to view archives:>
> >>  >> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l> > All messages
> >>  >> transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies and >
> >>  disclaimers
> >>  >> posted at:> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim>
> >  > >> -----------------------------------------> > >
> >>  >>
> >>
>  ________________________________________________________________________>
> >>  >> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
> >>  >> http://webmail.aol.com>
> >>  _______________________________________________>
> >>  >> OpenHeart-L mailing list> > Send postings to:>
> >>  >> OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email
> >>  address,
> >>  >> or to view archives:>
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l>
> >>  >
> >>  >> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the
> policies
> >>  and
> >>  >> > disclaimers posted at:> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim>
> >>  >> -----------------------------------------
> >>  >> _________________________________________________________________
> >>  >> Free games, great prizes - get gaming at Gamesbox.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>
> http://www.searchgamesbox.com_______________________________________________
> >>  >>  OpenHeart-L mailing list
> >>  >>
> >>  >> Send postings to:
> >>  >>  OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
> >>  >>
> >>  >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> >>  >> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
> >>  >>
> >>  >> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the
> policies
> >>  >> and
> >>  >> disclaimers posted at:
> >>  >> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> >>  >> -----------------------------------------
> >>  >>
> >>  > _______________________________________________
> >>   > OpenHeart-L mailing list
> >>  >
> >>  > Send postings to:
> >>  > OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
> >>  >
> >>  > To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> >>  > http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
> >>  >
> >>  > All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the
> policies
> >>  and
> >>  > disclaimers posted at:
> >>  > http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> >>  > -----------------------------------------
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  OpenHeart-L mailing list
> >>
> >>  Send postings to:
> >>   OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
> >>
> >>  To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> >>  http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
> >>
> >>  All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the
> policies
> >>  and
> >>  disclaimers posted at:
> >>  http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> >>  -----------------------------------------
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenHeart-L mailing list
> >
> >Send postings to:
> >  OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
> >
> >To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> >http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
> >
> >All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies
> and
> >disclaimers posted at:
> >http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> >-----------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenHeart-L mailing list
> >
> >Send postings to:
> >  OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
> >
> >To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> >http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
> >
> >All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies
> and
> >disclaimers posted at:
> >http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> >-----------------------------------------
>
>
> --
> Ben Bidstrup FRACS FRCSEd FEBCTS
> Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgeon
> _______________________________________________
> OpenHeart-L mailing list
>
> Send postings to:
>  OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
>
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies
> and
> disclaimers posted at:
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> -----------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenHeart-L mailing list
>
> Send postings to:
>  OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
>
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the policies
> and
> disclaimers posted at:
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> -----------------------------------------
>


More information about the OpenHeart-L mailing list