[HSF] radial artery-vein patch
Donald Ross
donross at bigpond.com
Tue Mar 4 11:59:06 EST 2008
Hal,
You make an excellent point and it is definitely a weakness of the
paper.
The problem is that there are a lot of conversions because it
includes all our surgeons and their indications and methods are
variable.
One guy for instance is a fair weather sailor and rarely does circs
off pump, so if it looks difficult when the heart is flipped he does
the case on pump with a X clamp ~ 30% whereas I do 5% on pump,
electively, beating heart. Urgent crash conversions are are not a
feature of our practice because of our caution and experience.
However, since most of the cases are those of the two dedicated
opcabers who eschew the aorta if possible I think the conclusions
are close to valid. The anaortic neurological complication rate is
the same as that for coronary angiography!
Don
On 03/03/2008, at 10:54 PM, Hgrmd at aol.com wrote:
> Don,
> That's a very interesting paper. However, I would like to know the
> number, mortality, morbidity, and neurologic fate of the failed
> intent to treats.
> That's the problem with most of these OPCAB papers. They pick and
> choose. I
> can recall at least one paper detailing the substantial M and M
> associated
> with emergent conversion.
>
> Hal
>
>
>
> **************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
> (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-
> campos-duffy/
> 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
> _______________________________________________
> OpenHeart-L mailing list
>
> Send postings to:
> OpenHeart-L at lists.hsforum.com
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, to CHANGE email address, or to view archives:
> http://mmp.cjp.com/mailman/listinfo/openheart-l
>
> All messages transmitted by the OpenHeart-L are subject to the
> policies and
> disclaimers posted at:
> http://www.hsforum.com/listdisclaim
> -----------------------------------------
More information about the OpenHeart-L
mailing list